How is downloading music stealing

It can also affect struggling artists by causing them to take longer to produce or worse, become nonexistent. The same mentality needs to be applied to music downloads.

While choosing to stream music with popular streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music and Pandora may seem more convenient and ethical, it can also cause problems for artists. These are better methods but the amount these streaming services pay the artists can be ridiculously low. Music Year-End Report. Spotify has over million active users and Pandora has over If students want more new, good music, they need to pay for it.

Edit Close. Toggle navigation. High near 90F. Winds SW at 5 to 10 mph.. For the music industry, this includes downloading music for free, sharing music with friends and emailing links for songs to friends.

Many think pirating music is a small act that does not have great effect on the artist or the music industry. She said she has strong opinions about piracy. Driessen explained that whether or not the copyright infringer is making money, they are still in violation and the consequences could be great. Taylor Abegg-Lawrence, a sophomore from Provo studying microbiology, had his own definition of piracy.

If I pirate a car, in the morning they still have a car. But will they be doing anything morally wrong? It might seem obvious that what they will do is wrong. After all, it is illegal. Same-sex relationships, divorce and many other practices that are now widely accepted as morally acceptable were once outlawed and criminally sanctioned.

Few people think they were wrong just before they were legalised. Rather, they tend to think the laws governing these behaviours were unjust. Two rival camps dominate public discussion around the ethics of illegal downloading. These think that all ideas and artistic creation should be held in common and be freely accessible to all. In their view, intellectual property, in the form of copyright and patents, unfairly restricts access to ideas and expression.

They consider illegal downloading to be victimless crime, and do not think it imposes significant cost on anyone. In their view, the serious criminal sanctions that sometimes attach to illegal downloading are draconian and unjustified. This camp thinks that illegal downloading is equivalent to common theft. Downloading pirated films is stealing.

According to fundamentalist protectors, owners of intellectual property deserve just as much protection and means for redress as those who have had their handbags or televisions stolen, including civil and criminal sanction against those who have violated their intellectual property. For them, the massive penalties that are sometimes attached to illegal downloading are important because they send a clear message that this practice should not be tolerated.

This seems to be the view of much of the entertainment industry , as well as public officials and legislatures in countries that produce and export a lot of intellectual property.

Despite their currency, both of these positions are overdrawn and seem at odds with moral common sense. In common theft, the owner of property is entirely deprived of its use, as well as their ability to share it and dispose of it as they choose.